Oh, please. Yes, do it: link.
There's nothing worse in court than being right and not having the money to prove it.
Looks like $500 a year could get you $100,000 of coverage, including playing your opponent's legal costs if you lose.
Hope it gets approved.
One hitch: Doesn't cover family law issues.
An interrogation of "It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be plausible..." —Tom Flanagan, former Harper adviser.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Postal Code Is Not a Tax Return
I was called an “Eastern parasite” on Facebook the other day. This was not based on a detailed examination of my finances. The gentleman😐 h...
-
Is merely having a hyperlink to material deemed libelous enough to be found guilty of disseminating libel? The Supreme Court of Canada will ...
-
Don't take the bribe! Jack is making conciliatory noises towards Harper. Harper averted a summer election by placating Ignatieff wit...
-
Well, libel is the subject today, it seems. Go read Dr. Dawg for some real life insight into how the libel defense of Fair Comment works. P...
2 comments:
One hitch,scum lawyers will figure out that you have insurance and just like auto body extortionists will gouge the system.The scum of the world are politicians and lawyers,but I repeat myself.
Well, insurance companies have lawyers too, and they will have further definitions as to what is reasonable.
I've had a use for this kind of insurance a few times.
Post a Comment