It's late, and I'm running tests on code for a client.
The code's been driving me crazy.
Instead of searching and shaping existing data to test my algorithms, I'm adding some code simulating data -- fudge. As I control the data, I can look for a clear, pre-determined outcome. If I keep getting what I expect, then I know the algorithms work. Then, I'll comment out the code, and will let the real data go through the algorithms.
Of course, if I was a climate scientist, this would be all evidence of improper tampering of results.
See Tim Lambert over at Deltoid for more.
An interrogation of "It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be plausible..." —Tom Flanagan, former Harper adviser.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes, Mr. Poilievre, Canada is wealthier than the USA
One of Pierre Poilievre's favourite talking points is that parts of the United States—Alabama, Mississippi, or the country as a whole, d...
-
Is merely having a hyperlink to material deemed libelous enough to be found guilty of disseminating libel? The Supreme Court of Canada will ...
-
Don't take the bribe! Jack is making conciliatory noises towards Harper. Harper averted a summer election by placating Ignatieff wit...
-
Well, libel is the subject today, it seems. Go read Dr. Dawg for some real life insight into how the libel defense of Fair Comment works. P...
No comments:
Post a Comment