Susan Delacourt raises two some points in her blog post this morning, concerning Harper's desire to reform the Senate. The one that sticks out for me is why should Harper be able to appoint a majority in the Senate when he can't get one in the Commons?
Sure it's constitutional, so this is a moral argument. Given that Harper wants to reform the Senate it is worth pushing that any reform should make sure that the PM, especially one presiding over a minority parliament, should have far less power over the Senate.
An interrogation of "It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be plausible..." —Tom Flanagan, former Harper adviser.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Be Pleased at America's Greed
The Canadian Shield. Days! I have spent days wanting to write about Canada's attempts to negotiate a reduction in these coercive tariffs...
-
Don't take the bribe! Jack is making conciliatory noises towards Harper. Harper averted a summer election by placating Ignatieff wit...
-
This is a photo show making the rounds of the 'Tea Baggers' protest in Washngton DC the other day. Take a good hard look at the dem...
-
The Conservatives are planning to dare the opposition parties to vote against an EI ways and means motion this coming Friday. It being a mo...
No comments:
Post a Comment