Susan Delacourt raises two some points in her blog post this morning, concerning Harper's desire to reform the Senate. The one that sticks out for me is why should Harper be able to appoint a majority in the Senate when he can't get one in the Commons?
Sure it's constitutional, so this is a moral argument. Given that Harper wants to reform the Senate it is worth pushing that any reform should make sure that the PM, especially one presiding over a minority parliament, should have far less power over the Senate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Not here, Over There!
Looking for me? This blog has been dead for quite a while. You can find my latest blog at https://korptopia.blogspot.ca/ My other social m...
-
You may have noticed that I am barely blogging lately. Truth is, I can't be bothered. After winning a share of the 6/49 lottery, I'...
-
That's all it takes these days? A mere telephone call to the Governor General , and Parliament is prorogued. How will he do it next ye...
-
Wayne Crookes appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada will be heard. This is the P2PNet case, which Crookes is suing over hyperlinks to mat...
No comments:
Post a Comment