By chance, I noticed that a recent press release on the Conservative Party website is identical to one published on the Government of Canada's Office of the Prime Minister's site.
Conservative website: 2010: An international year for Canada
Government website: 2010: An international year for Canada
Both claim copyright, and neither attribute the other.
The government website requires in materials reproduced that "...The Office of the Prime Minister be identified as the source department."
The Conservative website has a boilerplate copyright notice.
So, who wrote the release? The government or the Conservative Party?
Somehow, I doubt the Conservatives are subsidizing the government. More likely it's the other way around.
Perhaps this issue can be raised in the House? Oh, right... prorogued...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Not here, Over There!
Looking for me? This blog has been dead for quite a while. You can find my latest blog at https://korptopia.blogspot.ca/ My other social m...
-
You may have noticed that I am barely blogging lately. Truth is, I can't be bothered. After winning a share of the 6/49 lottery, I...
-
That's all it takes these days? A mere telephone call to the Governor General , and Parliament is prorogued. How will he do it next ye...
-
Wayne Crookes appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada will be heard. This is the P2PNet case, which Crookes is suing over hyperlinks to mat...
1 comment:
Good catch & good question!
Now how do we get it answered?
Post a Comment