I hesitate to delve into the Bryant case in any way which appears to be taking sides, but I thought this online article in NOW to be worth a check. It shows a video of what is claimed to be Bryant's car possibly hitting what appears to be a cyclist.
I'm making no claims as to it's accuracy. And the video is blurry.
Note that there's a reference to dueling Twitter accounts, one for Bryant, one for Sheppard. Both claim to be piping the truth (in 140 characters or less, no less!) .
I'd advise everyone to pull up a chair and wait for one party start papering the less well-financed of the two with libel letters. Of course, for all I know, it may be called for.
An interrogation of "It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be plausible..." —Tom Flanagan, former Harper adviser.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Postal Code Is Not a Tax Return
I was called an “Eastern parasite” on Facebook the other day. This was not based on a detailed examination of my finances. The gentleman😐 h...
-
Is merely having a hyperlink to material deemed libelous enough to be found guilty of disseminating libel? The Supreme Court of Canada will ...
-
Don't take the bribe! Jack is making conciliatory noises towards Harper. Harper averted a summer election by placating Ignatieff wit...
-
Well, libel is the subject today, it seems. Go read Dr. Dawg for some real life insight into how the libel defense of Fair Comment works. P...
No comments:
Post a Comment