A proposal for an independent body to oversee political debates instead of an unaccountable consortium? Heavens!
I agree with this, except for the part excluding the Bloc from English debates. Anglophones in Quebec are more comfortable in English, and the rest of Canada is not sufficiently bilingual. We need to know what the Bloc has to say.
An interrogation of "It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be plausible..." —Tom Flanagan, former Harper adviser.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Be Pleased at America's Greed
The Canadian Shield. Days! I have spent days wanting to write about Canada's attempts to negotiate a reduction in these coercive tariffs...
-
Don't take the bribe! Jack is making conciliatory noises towards Harper. Harper averted a summer election by placating Ignatieff wit...
-
The Conservatives are planning to dare the opposition parties to vote against an EI ways and means motion this coming Friday. It being a mo...
-
This is a photo show making the rounds of the 'Tea Baggers' protest in Washngton DC the other day. Take a good hard look at the dem...
2 comments:
Not to mention that there are French-speaking people who live outside of Quebec.
I don't agree with the polling part which is dumb. Polls can be rigged.
If they have seats in the House of Commons they should be able to be of the main debate - period.
It's called democracy and gerrymandering the debates. Soon we will be a republic like the US where in the end there is little political differences between republicans and democrats.
The present consortium is out-moded and reform is necessary. But keeping the BQ out of the english debate is completely stupid and probably wouldn't stand up to a Charter challenge. It amounts to shutting up Quebec's primary political voice to the RoC on its most-watched stage. Way to insult Quebecois(e) there!
Post a Comment