A proposal for an independent body to oversee political debates instead of an unaccountable consortium? Heavens!
I agree with this, except for the part excluding the Bloc from English debates. Anglophones in Quebec are more comfortable in English, and the rest of Canada is not sufficiently bilingual. We need to know what the Bloc has to say.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Not here, Over There!
Looking for me? This blog has been dead for quite a while. You can find my latest blog at https://korptopia.blogspot.ca/ My other social m...
-
You may have noticed that I am barely blogging lately. Truth is, I can't be bothered. After winning a share of the 6/49 lottery, I'...
-
That's all it takes these days? A mere telephone call to the Governor General , and Parliament is prorogued. How will he do it next ye...
-
Wayne Crookes appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada will be heard. This is the P2PNet case, which Crookes is suing over hyperlinks to mat...
2 comments:
Not to mention that there are French-speaking people who live outside of Quebec.
I don't agree with the polling part which is dumb. Polls can be rigged.
If they have seats in the House of Commons they should be able to be of the main debate - period.
It's called democracy and gerrymandering the debates. Soon we will be a republic like the US where in the end there is little political differences between republicans and democrats.
The present consortium is out-moded and reform is necessary. But keeping the BQ out of the english debate is completely stupid and probably wouldn't stand up to a Charter challenge. It amounts to shutting up Quebec's primary political voice to the RoC on its most-watched stage. Way to insult Quebecois(e) there!
Post a Comment